What Is Research?

June 14, 2008

Google, Wikipedia and blogosphere

Filed under: Uncategorized — vipulnaik @ 10:58 pm

(This blog post is a collection of links and random observations. No central point here.)

We’ve often been accused of being a generation with attention deficit, a generation spoiled by Google, Wikipedia, and the general ease of availability of information. Here are a few interesting articles to get started with this:

How the Internet is changing what we think we know: In this article, Larry Sanger, co-founder and initially the chief organizer of Wikipedia, says that “Information is easy, knowledge is diffcult”. His argument is that as information becomes easier and easier to find, knowledge, with the attendant hardwork and thought it entails, seems less and less lucrative. In an age where search engines answer our queries almost instantly, we may be all the less motivated to do the hardwork needed to figure things out.

It’s important to note that Sanger isn’t an anti-Internet reactionary in any sense; Sanger has been working on Internet-based projects with varying degrees of success (including Wikipedia, and a new encyclopedia project called Citizendium). Nor does he paint a rosy picture of a past where neither information nor knowledge was easy to find fast. Sanger, however, urges people to take seriously the responsibility that comes with gathering knowledge, to develop critical facilities and thinking, and to apply these critical facilities to the consumption of online information.

Nicholas Carr’s essay “Is Google making us stupid?” is in a somewhat different vein. Here, Carr laments the fact that as people do more and more of their reading online, they lose the attention and concentration needed to read longer, more involved books and arguments. Carr frames his argument more as a possibility to be warned against, than as a certainty that has come to pass. Carr is not quite an anti-Internet reactionary either, though he might be considered somewhat closer in description to one. Needless to say, there have been many thoughtful and thoughtless critiques of this, including this one by net evangelist Kevin Kelly. (Have you already left the site in an effort to keep up with the links?)

What do mathematicians and other academics have to say about the easy information that Google and other tools offer? A common refrain among academics and librarians is that Google and Wikipedia are fine starting points, but one should always go ahead and read primary sources. In fact, Wikipedia itself has a number of pages on how to do “research” with Wikipedia, for instance, this one. For the most part, mathematicians seem to be ignoring the effects of Google and Wikipedia on the structure and nature of mathematical knowledge. In my graduate year at the University of Chicago, I’ve so far caught three mentions of Wikipedia by professors. One professor, in an assignment, warned us that a certain page on Wikipedia had a subtle error in a definition. Another professor, while writing a good reference for material he taught, winked at us saying we could anyway find it all on Wikipedia. In a third instance, a professor pointed out, during a talk, that a Wikipedia entry on a topic had a subtle but grave error.

Google, too, has received a number of side mentions. In one notable instance, Professor Alperin said that, out of curiosity as well as professional need, he once asked Google how to classify all cyclic subgroups of an Abelian group, and Google churned out a paper written in the 1930s that answered the question. Another professor pointed out that Google was a very effective calculator. On other occasions, professors who do not remember URLs or websites simply tell us to Google them.

These mentions notwithstanding, there does not seem to, in general, be any cognizance of a fundamental shift in knowledge acquisition being brought about by sources like Google and Wikipedia. However, there are some mathematicians who’re moving into the new web era, and providing short chunky stuff that can be served in web-sized spoons (i.e., that can fit the attention span of surfers). Notable in this regard are the large number of blogs and wikis started by mathematicians. For instance, there is the Noncommutative geometry blog, where some noncommutative geometers post quick information about conferences, seminars, and ideas in the subject. There’s the Dispersive Wiki, which is an attempt to put together some stuff on PDEs related to dispersion. And then there are the large number of mathematicians who’ve got into blogging, including Fields Medalists like Terence Tao and Richard Borcherds. Their blog posts range from “today, in class we did this” to “hey, I have an idea” to the more well-thought-out articles discussing pros and cons of something or how to go about doing something.

Terence Tao, a great proponent of letting the public at large get an idea of what goes on inside mathematics, has experimented with a number of ventures, ranging from a blog book (a book in blog form) to making a contribution to Scholarpedia, a site that aims to aggregate scholarly articles on a wiki. However, enthusiasm such as Tao’s is still largely unshared by the mathematical community.

The mathematical community has also made efforts to recognize the new challenges and opportunities provided by tools like Google Scholar. For instance, This AMS report talks of the problem of searching a vast database of content using Google Scholar, which has no way of responding to questions like “find an expository article on this topic suitable for a first-year graduate student”. Certain solutions and approaches have been suggested.

On the whole, however, it seems to me that the mathematical community (and the academic community at large) has not fully registered the implications of the changing dynamic of knowledge. That’s because mathematicians, like all other human beings, are trapped in things as they stand now, rather than things as they could be. This is probably best exemplified by the passive way in which mathematicians have come to accept the growing role that Google and Wikipedia have come to play, without pausing to ask, “Okay, what’s going on!” Some have transformed this passive acceptance into jumping into the fray. In the biological sciences, where funding is replete, attempts to create impressive online databases and concept collections have received more attention; for instance, there’s Wiki Professional.



  1. Brilliant!

    Comment by MokAmatteMem — August 3, 2008 @ 3:05 am

  2. free money – free money online enjoy.

    Comment by jonxy4x32 — September 6, 2010 @ 3:44 pm

  3. http://www.sempreaggiornati.com

    Comment by john1alpha — September 25, 2010 @ 6:05 pm

  4. Using To Have The You’ve Always Dreamed Of!

    The Magic Power Coffee benefits…
    There isn’t a fella out there that wouldn’t kill to improve his sexual performance. Even the guys you seen in the blue movies would give
    pretty much anything for an extra boost, and that’s where comes in.

    a totally safe to use performance enhancement product that will make any regular guy
    into a stud in the sack overnight.
    You don’t have to worry when using as they only include 100% harmless ingredients, so there’s no need to worry about those
    ill effects when using them. The uniquely created
    mix has been carefullycreated to give your body everything it needs to perform like a stud in the sack, and making sure you have those women orgasms every time.
    Clinical studies have proven the power of the magic coffee time and time again, so you can be sure that it’ll work just as well for you too.

    Magic power Coffee.
    Your body is literally begging for you to give it the ingredients it needs for those porn star . And, will give your
    body everything it craves with the unique mix to achieve those porn star .
    So, the next time you take a woman back to your place, you’ll be a lot more confident. You’ll not only be able to blow her away, but you’ll have the best porn star
    ever too. But, if it’s rock hard erections that you are looking for, well A Male Enhancement drink
    got your back again. will give you erections that you’ve only ever dreamed about. Not only will they be rock hard, but they’ll last
    and last and last. You’re sexual cravings will be will be boosted, and you’ll be able to keep on going all night,
    like the Duracell bunny. Your lady friend will think that she’s in a movie with the Oscar worthy performance you’re giving.

    Comment by uttectent — September 29, 2010 @ 2:00 am

  5. Sorry To ask, but i don`t know what a backlink is ? Here is one site that offers backlinks for $50, i am wondering if this will gonna help my sites ?? here is the site: Backlinks

    Comment by sabyno22 — November 24, 2010 @ 9:43 am

  6. hi readers .love this place. trader blog .

    Comment by marketforecaPW — December 6, 2010 @ 4:19 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: